What People Don't Understand about the Priesthood in the LDS Church

Moses giving Aaron the Aaronic/Levitical priesthood.

I've been following the hubbub over the protests of Ordain Women for some time now. When I was 14, I probably would have agreed with them - as back then my brothers were snotty, strutting around, and thinking they were better than me because they held the Aaronic Priesthood. But I have since grown up and learned a thing or two about the nature of the priesthood that I had not known before. And now, understanding even more, I see now that women having the priesthood is entirely and completely unnecessary.

"Unnecessary?" You might protest. "What about equal rights?" You might say.

I'll answer that. Equal rights in the world is a great deal different from equal intrinsic value in the eternities. That is to say, the worldly sense of equal rights demands that everyone gets the same thing. This is basic elementary logic. But what basic elementary logic ignores is the higher, more educated understanding that giving everyone the same thing is not always healthy or beneficial.

Not following? Let me make it more plain.

If I gave everyone a raspberry cream cheese danish (exactly the same size) to everyone - would everyone be healthy and happy?

At first leap, you'd say yes. But I have a sister who is gluten intolerant, a brother allergic to raspberries, and another sister who can't have milk products. Starting with these three people alone, you've got three miserable folk who just can't eat what I gave to them. This does not count the toothless people, or people who have to be tube-fed, or infants who can take one bite, if not able to eat it at all. Or what about people who HATE cream cheese. Or are on the Paleo diet? Vegan? So, it can logically be added up that true fairness is for me to provide alternatives that allow my gluten-free sister, raspberry-free brother, and milk-free sister something just as good. That is to say, true fairness and equality is giving people what they actually need rather than giving the same all around. In fact, just giving people what they want is not the same as giving them what they need.

And believe me, my gluten-free sister would rather not be gluten-free if she didn't need to be.

Ok, so what does this have to do with the priesthood?

Lots.

I think one of the most misunderstood things about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is the nature of the priesthood within the church. To make it clear, the priesthood within the LDS church is not like that of other Christian faiths in many respects. First off, we claim the priesthood was passed on to us through lines of proper authority, that it had to be restored - which upsets a lot of people who don't believe this is true at all.

But there are aspects of the priesthood that some members of our faith also don't quite comprehend.

As everyone is in a state of growth, I will list what I discovered. In doing so I hope to clear up a lot of misunderstanding that even members of my faith have.

1. The priesthood in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not a paid profession.
 
It is not a career. In other churches you study to get the priesthood. In other churches, you go to college for the priesthood. It is a life path, and it stands out.

In the LDS church, you do not aspire to a position or calling. Not at all. Ever. You are called of God into positions. There is no seeking. There are no rungs of ladders which you climb. Bishops (another link) and Stake Presidents, and such are called to such positions through much fasting and prayer. And they don't stay in those positions forever. In fact, many of these leaders are often released from their callings and end up serving as Sunday School teachers, or even Nursery Leaders. The same goes for area authorities and Seventies. Apostles are in their position for the long haul - unless they transgress the laws of God and are excommunicated (yes, it can happen). Prophets likewise. Fact is, Christ is the head of the church. Not the prophet.

Fact is, all these leaders hold a different profession to pay for their livelihoods. I had one who was a dentist. Another who owned a plant nursery. And I have an older brother who is currently serving as a bishop, yet pays for his livelihood through teaching elementary school, and writing novels. We feel the gospel ought to be shared without money and without price. As in the New Testament when Simon the magician attempted to buy the priesthood from Peter, the priesthood is not a commodity to be bought or sold.

Some people might argue that general authorities are given a living stipend, and are therefore paid. Here's a site that explains that more clearly. Considering how they are always on the go... not vacationing in the Bahamas like some detractors imagine, or have any leisure time to speak of for that matter, their meek stipend is understandable. And it is a speck in comparison to what Congress gets for making laws that suit only themselves.... or even what the President of the US gets when long out of office and doing nothing.

2. The priesthood in the LDS church is organized the same as in the early/primitive church of Christ's era.

That's right. We have a prophet who heads the church and whom be believe receives revelation from God, the same as Moses, Abraham, Isaiah, and all those wonderful Biblical prophets of ancient times. Under our modern prophet are 12 apostles, who are called to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the nations, and to declare that Jesus Christ truly is the son of the Living God, the Father of Heaven and Earth. And under them are other church positions, such as seventies, evangelists (missionaries in modern lingo), teachers and so forth.

3. The power and authority of the priesthood is not that of a despot, but that of a steward.

In the worldly sense, power is a strength used to compel people to do a thing and to control a thing. But within the LDS church, the power of the priesthood is like that of the power of a steward to a lord, in a rather literal sense.

Today we don't really deal with many stewards in the old fealty sort of sense. But not too long ago (mostly back in Europe as most people in the US just didn't do this sort of thing, as lords and ladies were things of 'ancient history') when lords left their territory, they had servants who oversaw their land and made sure their will was still carried out even after they were gone. The responsibility of a steward was high, and he was probably the most trusted servant to a lord (watch Jane Austen films, and you'll run across mention of stewards). A steward's task is not to do that which he wants to do, but only the will of his lord. Jesus Christ himself told parables about unjust stewards that did not follow the will of their lords.

So, as in the LDS church, the role of the priesthood is not to set laws and such, but to seek the will of the Lord and to do it.

4. The priesthood can be lost if it is used improperly.

There are a lot of really sad stories circulating about priests in churches who have abused children and done other awful things. This, of course, is not what God wants to happen. But as God grants us free will, and that he is not a despot sending out secret police to regulate the actions of his claimed followers, people make bad choices.

That said, within our faith priesthood holders make an oath and a covenant when obtaining the priesthood. In our scripture, Doctrine and Covenants, Section 121, it describes this principle. The rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven, and they can be only handled or used righteously. If any priesthood holder ever attempts to use his priesthood unrighteously, as the scripture says "Amen to that priesthood." He loses it.

And when we talk about losing the priesthood, we are not just talking about losing a title... we are talking about losing power from God. This is power to heal. Power to bless lives. Power to do much good. Power to be guided by God.

You also lose authority. Authority to officiate in ordinances, which are sacred formal acts performed by the priesthood.

You also lose the right to enter the Temple.

You see, women can enter the temple without holding the priesthood. But men cannot enter the temple without the priesthood. Not at all, in fact. Men need the priesthood in order to be considered worthy members of the faith.

5. The priesthood isn't about ruling. It is about serving and healing.

There is this phrase that has been going around about the priesthood that I think is incredibly incorrect: Do not confuse the scepter of responsibility with the club of authority. I understand the reason people quote this, but I really think it is a false teaching. The priesthood is not a scepter. It is most definitely not a club. It is an apron.


aprons are put on to go to work

"An apron?" you may wonder. "How?"

I'll tell you. And - by the way - this is the key to why it is not necessary for women to hold the priesthood.


British scepter.

Symbolically, a scepter is a tool used by a king. But there is only one king within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints... and that is Christ himself.

A club is a weapon of war. A symbol of abuse, power, and brutality. Definitely not traits of a righteous priesthood holder (as mentioned above).



war club

But an apron is a symbol of a servant. Most aprons are put on when getting ready for work, either with cooking, cleaning, serving, creating with wood and iron, as well as any other need for protection. It is also regarded (funnily enough) as feminine.

Jesus Christ, when among his 12 apostles in ancient days, talked a great deal about who was the greatest in the kingdom of Heaven. He compared the greatest as a child, but He also tried to show that the greatest was a servant.

Now I really don't think anything Jesus Christ said was throwaway, so He meant something very important by it. At the time He was sharing this message, it was near the time of His death. But throughout his life Jesus emphasized the importance of humility and service. Did He run around bossing and condemning people? Or did He go around teaching, healing, and serving people?

I think we all know the answer to this one.

Now, why in the world is it that women can't wear this apron too?
The answer is simple. We've already got an apron.

"What??? I'm Confused!!!" you might say.

Let me make it clearer... in the world we live in today, the apron women put on to go to work is a different apron to the one men need to wear. Women give service while wearing the apron of... (dun, dun, dun....) MOTHERHOOD.

"What?" they exclaim with insult and exasperation....

And here is the problem. The world we live in today disrespects and treats the apron of Motherhood with so much disdain and disregard that we no longer see Motherhood as an ennobling and important calling. Today, people have framed Motherhood into the mold of slavery, casting on it the colors of unimportance, and smearing it with the mud of disrespect. We live in a world where career has been put onto a pedestal and worshipped. And Motherhood is obviously not a career.

Fact is, being a mother is not only hard, but crucial to the survival of a free and healthy society. The job of fatherhood is also crucial, as its job is to aid Mother, and protect and provide so the mother can perform the most important job of the world - to raise a healthy generation of people so they are capable of leading on the world once the parents are gone.

The world today keeps talking about preserving nature, and saving things so that it can be green. But it keeps killing the one thing that makes civilizations thrive - a healthy family life. Never forget that old adage: "The hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world." This is a true statement. And people who seek power know this. Oppressing and devaluing mothers, taking children from their true teachers is something that the Nazis and other oppressors have done systematically (Read Animal Farm, and pay attention to what they do with the pups). And it happening today.  

Mothers are not 'baby makers' as people like to popularly make out. They are nurturers. And mothers can and do nurture more than just the children they birth themselves.

But this is a topic for the next blog, I think. More detail is necessary.

The fact is, ladies, why is it you want the apron men have? They need it so they can become proper servants of God and to their fellow Man (and I do mean this in the general sense, since we call all cows and geese by the feminine word). It is theirs. Let them have it.  

The priesthood's purpose is two-fold... for man to serve God, and for God to help man grow to become more like him. Men in general do better when they have a duty. It is a natural fact. Women, naturally, are enculturated to be more social. Men, not so much. (Random fact, if you study Asperger's syndrome, women who have Asperger's tend to come across as more masculine, as it is a more female nature to be social and connect than it is a male's nature. Male Aspergians really struggle with connectivity).

Let me share one last story...

Years ago when I was at a church conference in Beijing, China, a woman regional authority leader opened our meeting with what I thought was an irrelevant question... "Why is it men have the priesthood and women don't?" I mean, I was there trying to figure out how to run a bilingual Primary (that's a Sunday school for little kids between ages 4 -11). I wasn't at all concerned with a perceived inequality. I mean, I figured if men wanted to drive the car, as long as it took me to where I wanted to go, I didn't care. Besides, it made me feel like a wealthy lady in the back seat, who could say to the chauffer, "Jeeves, turn here. Take me to the Waldorf Astoria, stat."

Anyway, with this question posed, "Why do men have the priesthood and women don't?" she then joked, "I mean, if women ran the church things would be done right the first time, right?"

At the time, all the ladies in the room chuckled. I did also, but I thought that joke was a bit old, and smug. It is kind of rude to assume half the world was inept, after all.

Then she said, "But seriously, the reason men hold the priesthood and women don't can be answered in this one question...."

And we waited for the question, wondering what it was.
 
She said, "What do women want the most?"

I thought about that, and so did everyone else. And blast it, she looked straight at me and said, "What do you think?"

Well, whenever anyone does that to me, my mind just blanks. I needed more time to think about what she was getting at. What was it that women wanted the most? Security? A purpose to life? A sense of fulfillment? These are the usual kinds of answers to such a question. But I just shrugged and offered: "Things run right?"

She shook her head and looked to the others. "No. The church itself does not exist to run right. The running of the church itself is an exercise for the growth of its members. Ladies, think. What is it that women want most?"

And we all thought in silence. I'm sure someone had thought of the right answer, but was too shy to speak up. So, finally, the speaker said - and this was profound - "What women want the most... is righteous men."

Now, I don't know if everyone in the world agrees with that. In fact, I doubt they do. Not everyone in the world agrees on every truth in the world. There are plenty of fools out there that think it is ok to binge drink and sleep around... But that belief doesn't make it right.

"A public opinion poll is no substitute for thought" and might I add, truth does not come from a popularity poll either.

Truth is, a righteous woman would want all men to be righteous. Because righteous women would be seeking the benefit of humankind. Period. And wicked men just don't produce that.

The hard part for women (and I think this is the life test of ALL women) is the ability to step back and let someone else take the lead. Humility - a trait Jesus Christ valued highly - is what's critical.

Also, I think the one lesson of life "You can't have everything." should be shifted to: "Maybe you shouldn't have everything." It is kind of greedy to want everything.

Out of the mouth of an apostle (who recently passed away), I think he explains the priesthood clearly.



What is the priesthood all about?

"To bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of Man."

Personally, I think women have enough on our plates. A relieving help from the men, acting righteously, is welcome.

Z is for Zealous

Jewish Zealots

I think the word zealot has often been given a bad rap. It is an old word, used to describe an ancient Jewish religious group that had resisted Rome until A.D. 70. But today people use it to describe a fanatic. In general, the world we live in takes things to the extremes.

 



According to Merriam Webster a zealot is: "a person who has very strong feelings about something (such as religion or politics) and who wants other people to have those feelings : a zealous person".

 

Honestly, who doesn't want others to think like them. We all seek out like-thinking people. We all try to share our points of view with others, hoping others will be convinced that we are right. Anything else is wishy-washy.

 

But a large portion of the world population is fearful of the opinions of others, scared of being ostracized. And out of fear, they try not to form opinions at all until the majority has ruled on an 'accepted truth' (This is different than standing by real truth, by the way - either scientifically discovered truth or revealed truth from God. Real science is not made through a popularity poll. And truth from God comes through revelation and not general popular consensus).



how many feel



Of course, many of us prefer to avoid an argument.

 

But to change where you stand based off of a popular opinion poll is really silly. 

 

Zealous people, to be honest, are a little frightening. Yet as most people go with the flow, zealous people enthusiastically go where they want to go. It is when they try to steer the flow that people really freak out.

 

a zealot forcing his agenda

In other words: it isn't really even the zeal in which people share their beliefs that bothers the world. I think the real issue isn't their enthusiastic desire, but the force some zealots use to further their agendas.







 

On both sides of the political spectrum, there are zealots. And they hate each other.

 

modern zealots

Take an extreme liberal and take an extreme conservative, put them in a room and they might kill each other - or become best friends out of their love for debate (I've seen both). And zealous people of faith can sometimes go too far.



 

 

 



So why am I calling it a virtue?????

 

courage to stand alone

Truth is, the enthusiasm and stick-to-it-iveness of being zealous is a virtue. It is the awesome virtue that helps people hang on to truth when the entire world is against you. It is the energy that brings excitement when you want to share the amazing good news with others. It is the happy energy that gives you strength to go on when everything around you can feel so oppressive.



But any virtue can be twisted into a vice. For example, Love can become Lust. Humility can become Humiliation. Youthful can become Childish. Self-control can become Control-freaky. Modest can become Self-deprecating. Just can become Unyielding. Forgiving can become Human-Doormat. And Patience, our first virtue covered, can become Inert/immobile. The point is, every virtue when applied to human society can be taken too far and misunderstood.

 

The zealousness I'd like to promote here is the strength and enthusiasm for truth. All true followers of a cause have this virtue.

 

And why is it a Godly virtue?

 

Because God himself is zealously giving His all to our future happiness...whether we understand that's what He's doing or not.

 

And though His commandments are not highly popular, or even enjoyed, He sticks to them. He is not the wishy-washy parent that gets pushed around by His kids. He is the example and shows what we must do - whether we like it or not. And further - though He has done his best to teach us the right and true way to real happiness... He allows us to choose for ourselves rather than using force. This is the best kind of zealot.

 

Z is for Zealous.

Y is for Youthful

I think being Youthful is highly misunderstood.

I don't mean being young physically.
Or young mentally or emotionally.

I mean young-at-heart.

What is that? you might ask...

It is having a sense of wonder in the world. It is finding the joy in the little things, like a rainstorm, a dandelion, or a mud puddle. It is not stressing out over perfection, but having joy at the small accomplishments, such as trying something new. It is enjoying life and all that it offers without need of accolades, fanfare, or fame.

Adults, when they grow up, tend to lose the joy of life and start to seek after darker, more addicting pleasures. They start to fear what people think of them. Kids don't.


kids who dressed themselves.

Ideas such as Popularity and Public Opinion are foreign concepts to them.

Youthful people are the same.

They live life, not to challenge life with a belligerent attitude, but live it while being themselves. I knew this one girl in college who was like this. She dressed little goofy, didn't stress about her body shape, and carried around an old Star Wars lunch box - and everyone admired her for her bravery. She wasn't sexy. She didn't even think about that stuff. And that made her more likeable.

People like Luna Lovegood
are young-at-heart


I think this is why I like reading fantasy novels so much. They bring out the wonder, and don't tell gossipy tales about who did what and wore what which was so scandalous. But stories about individuals who were unique, acted on their inner feelings, and struggled with life.

To put it in perspective, the opposite of Youthful is Jaded and Cynical.

Being jaded is having lost enthusiasm and pleasure in life. It is filled with boredom, seeing the world around us as junk, and taking much of what you have for granted.

Cynics are a little worse.
I once heard someone say "Cynics never contribute." Which is SO true. A cynic is a critic. He sits back and complains. A cynic looks for the flaws rather than the joys. A cynic looks for ulterior motives. It is someone who expects the milk to quickly go sour and to look for the cockroach that may have crawled into your ice cream. Or just looking for the cost of the moment. Where the youthful chase rainbows, the cynic is staring at the clouds, waiting for the rain to dump. Where the youthful dance in the rain, the cynic is pessimistic, feeling a cold coming on, his socks wet, and complaining that the sun is never out long. And when a youthful person get sunburned, he gets a kick out of watching his skin peel as something fascinating. Whereas a cynic is thinking about skin cancer and the irony that the sun brings evil too.

Youthfulness is about finding joy in life. It is about being grateful for the simple things. So really it is an obvious Godly trait.

God really isn't about blessing us with gold falling out of the sky in grand demonstrative miracles. He is all about the small and simple wonders. He is about pleasant breezes. Enjoyable sunsets. Fresh fruit. Pleasing rain. And warm sunshine. He is also about wintery snowstorms, where snuggly fires and close story times bring people together. He is about personal conversations. Small 'thank-you's and kind forgiveness. He is also about Eternal Life, which is about eternal growth and finding joy in the future.

Y is for Youthful

X is for Xenophilic

Xenophilic, for those who don't know, is love of 'strangers/foreigners/outsiders'. It is the opposite of Xenophobic.

Now, I'm not implying the obsessive Xenophilia where you are embarrassed about your own culture.  And I am most certainly not thinking about the perverse Xenophilia such as pedophilia and such, which you can find examples of all over the net and really DON'T need to be shared.

No.

I am more thinking on the lines of not distrusting other cultures and differences simply because they are unfamiliar, or just not your culture.

I think a bit more on the lines Xenophilius Lovegood who raised a child like Luna Lovegood in the Harry Potter novels. The character was wildly eccentric, open-minded about things most people refuse to believe, and the kind of man who stands up for the unpopular, yet right view.

Whenever I think of Xenophilia, think of the film "My Big Fat Greek Wedding".




It is one of my favorites movies.

A Xeno... what Gus is saying, is a foreigner. The lady who is the star once said in an interview that the film is a small parody on her own experience. And she said that it always struck her funny that her father called those who were not Greek 'foreigners', even if they were in America and the person he was talking about was American. So, obviously xeno meant 'outsider' in his case.

I think every community has this insider/outsider dichotomy that causes a lot of trouble in the world. This US verses THEM thinking is what sparks animosity, hatred, distrust, and most of the hatful -isms of today (racism, sexism, etc...).  It is what made the Nazis choose to make the Jews their scapegoat for their economic troubles before WWII. It is the same reason jihadists aim to kill anyone who does not believe they way they do. It is also the same motive for Custer and the other Indian fighters to participate in the attempted annihilation of the native Lakota... the same reason why the Serbians and Croatians could not get along... the same reason why Israel and the Arab nations continue the centuries-long struggle... and the same reason why Apartheid had lasted as long as it had in South Africa. It is also the reason why citizens in the territories of the Unites States, such as American Samoa and Puerto Rico, can join the army but they do not have the vote.



Fact is, Xenophobia - fear of the outsider- is one of the root reasons we are having so much trouble between people.

Now, how do we know it is Xenophobia and they are not just being mean and selfish?

Honestly, I think it is natural for anyone to feel an initial aversion to something different from what a person is used to - regardless of race, gender, or cultural upbringing. It is a safety mechanism that protects us from dangerous things, such as unhealthy behavior and possible disease. Discernment is an important skill for survival. It helps young ladies avoid creepy men. It helps young men avoid the psycho ladies. It helps children avoid those that might harm them.

HOWEVER, there is a difference between noticing something is not kosher, and simply choosing to hate something for being different. Where one is truly rational - such as noticing a man in the park playing with knives with scars carved into his own skin - and running away fast...
And the other irrational - such as disliking someone playing with knives...in a circus, on stage, grinning with during his performance, which the occasional scar because he had slipped in practice once, simply because he's circus folk.

Also, we must not forget that "the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been since the fall of Adam." And though it is natural to distrust at first things which are different, the intelligent and civilized human being thinks before coming to a conclusion.

So, where is it Xenophobia and where it is just meanness? Personally, I think we choose what we hate the same way we choose what we wear. One might have a natural aversion to wool, as it is itchy, but it is another thing to refuse to ever wear wool, to make fun of people who wear wool, and to campaign against the creation of wool.

Xenophilia (in the least perverse sense) is compassion for the different. It is the attempt of outreach to the thing that is new or foreign. It is the allowance that there is something new to be learned. It is expansive and open. It is in fact the thing that allows children and adults to try new foods, listen to new music, and to see things they never have seen before. It is the attitude of an explorer - but not a conqueror. It is the attitude of a peace emissary, but not a lobbyist.

How is this a Godly trait?

God commands us to love our neighbors and love our enemies. It is at the heart of Christian doctrine. Hate has no place in it. Jesus himself spent time with those that were outcasts to show how God loves all. And he spent time with them, teaching them the ways towards happiness.

Being Xenophilic in the best sense does not mean accepting every practice that exists on planet earth by everyone simply because it is different and new - that's just plain nuts. But it does consist of caring about the well-being of all, being humble, and teachable.

X is for Xenophilic.